EU Referendum 23 June 2016

EU Referendum 23 June 2016

The future for British Nationalism

The recent European elections were a disaster for all UK Nationalist parties.

The fact that the BNP lost their MEP's isn't of any importance as they never stood a chance of holding those seats anyway. That they lost all their deposits is the real issue. In the European elections you only need 2.5% to save a deposit and the BNP finished below that in every part of England, Scotland and Wales. The party scored a grand total of 1.14% with their best vote being 1.87% in the North West.

The English Democrats did even worse. They also lost all their deposits and scored a grand total of 0.80% with their best vote being 1.52% in the North East.

Andrew Brons new party the British Democrats didn't contest the election, which with hindsight appears to have been the correct decision.

So where do we all go from here?

Next year (2015) we have a general election. I believe it would be a complete waste of time, effort and money for any Nationalists to contest this election. We should take the difficult, and unpopular, decision to boycott the general election and instead get back to our roots contesting borough and district councils only. And only contesting those seats where we genuinely believe we can achieve 10% of the vote or higher.

Of course it won't happen. The members of all 3 parties will want to contest the general election so the next best option is to only contest a small number of seats where we can concentrate our efforts and try to get as close to 5% as possible. We also need to take action to ensure we don't all contest the same seats whatever the leaderships of the 3 parties may think.

I personally believe that Nationalism will achieve nothing at the ballot box for the rest of this decade but early in the next decade one party will emerge as the frontrunner just like in the mid 80's when the BNP took over from the National Front as the voice of British Nationalism. Which party it will be remains to be seen.

BNP European election broadcast

New Zealand aims to be smokefree

New Zealand is planning on becoming the first country in the world to go smokefree. In March 2011 the New Zealand Government committed to a goal of New Zealand becoming smokefree by 2025.


It's about time Britain put forward its own smokefree plans.

As smoking numbers drop and new statistics reveal it is no longer New Zealand’s worst killer, health workers are convinced we can eradicate smoking within just 12 years – much like we eradicated the southern saltmarsh mosquito, smallpox and polio. The tobacco industry, it seems, is in its final days.

The language is unscholarly and uncompromising. This is the endgame.
Big Tobacco, the king that has presided for so long over the chessboard of public health, is isolated, and the pawns are closing in.

"The New Zealand government's goal of achieving a smoke-free society by 2025 reflects growing interest in 'endgame' solutions to tobacco smoking," the British Medical Journal reported last year.
Tobacco companies portray attempts to eradicate smoking as an assault on individual freedoms and choice, the journal article continued, heightening politicians' sensitivity to 'nanny state' allegations.
"Public support for stronger policies could strengthen political will; however, little is known about how smokers perceive endgame scenarios ..."

The tobacco companies are cornered.

They have spent millions on advertising campaigns opposing plain packaging, and have taken court action in a high-stakes attempt to stop its implementation.

They are buying up electronic cigarette brands: if you can't beat the quit smoking brigade, buy 'em out.
They have hired some of the best-connected lobbyists in Wellington to whisper in the ears of politicians, and, in at least one documented case, have made cash contributions to a political leader's expenses.

Why so feral? It is because New Zealand is on track to become the first country in the world to vote to ban the sale of tobacco, and to stamp out its consumption in workplaces, public spaces and even - as the Herald on Sunday reveals today-private places like the family car.

Smokefree New Zealand is an ideal that, if successful, will have been more than 40 years in the making - but it faces a massive hurdle.

With 2025 edging closer, there are still around 650,000 New Zealanders - 18 per cent of the adult population - who continue to smoke.

In Gisborne, restaurateur Lee Fong stopped selling cigarettes six years ago. The owner of the China Palace saw the impact smoking was having on her customers and it troubled her.
"A lot of parents were spending a lot of money on smokes and were having problems looking after their own children."
She has not missed the cigarette revenue and, with the aid of nicotine replacement therapies, now boasts a 20-strong smokefree workforce.
People like Lee Fong are making a difference at a local level - but nationwide public health strategies to eradicate smoking will affect every New Zealander, not just the smokers.

Taxpayer dollars are being thrown at targeted mass media campaigns, generously-subsidised quit smoking products and wrap around support agencies. At the same time law makers are changing the legislative landscape as they strive to make smokefree environments the new normal.

The task of such wholesale change to social attitudes is both unprecedented and challenging but the cost, say those at the forefront, is worth it. You see, this is a matter of life and death.

The following 10 strategies will stub out smoking in New Zealand.

1. Smokefree cars

2. Slashing supply

3. Plain packs

4. Smokefree communities

5. Cutting duty-free tobacco

6. Tax hikes

7. Mass media shock tactics

8. Removing all flavour enhancers

9. Booting out the lobbyists

10. Quit smoking support

- Herald on Sunday

Why be smokefree? 

There are heaps of reasons to be smokefree.

Save money

The cost of tobacco continues to increase. In 2012 a 20 pack of cigarettes costs around $14.50, and a 30g pouch of tobacco around $31.50.
Smoking is an expensive habit - smoking a pack a day costs around $5,300 per year.
If you quit it's like giving yourself a pay rise – you can spend the extra money on whatever you choose. You might like to treat yourself to something special with the money you've saved.

Protect your children

Most parents and caregivers don't want their children to smoke, even if they are smokers themselves.
If you're smokefree you won't be exposing your children to the toxins from tobacco smoke. Children who are exposed to tobacco smoke can suffer from its effects. The small lungs and lighter weight of young children make them particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of second-hand smoke. Their exposure is linked to:

• middle ear infections (including glue ear)
• lower respiratory illnesses (including croup, bronchitis, bronchiolitis and pneumonia)
• the onset of asthma and worsening of asthmatic symptoms
• reduced lung growth
• sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS, or cot death)
• meningococcal disease.

Be healthier

The impacts of smoking on your body and health are widely known.

Also, if you are ever injured or have surgery you will recover quicker if you are smokefree.

Live longer

Growing up, we learn from each other - whether it's parenting tips, how to play sport, how to speak, or how to cook. When we lose our parents, our aunts and uncles, we lose a resource and opportunities to learn from them and their many skills.
By quitting smoking you can start to live a healthier life and increase the time that your loved ones can learn from you, and you from them.

Feel better about yourself

A lot of people have had enough of smoking. Feedback from smokers shows that they are sick of trying to hide the fact they are still smoking and feel bad every time they light up. Among the advantages of giving up are that your clothes, hair and breath will stop smelling of smoke. Your car and home will smell better too.
Smoking is so addictive that it can dictate what people do and when. Get your control back and do things when you want, where you want and with who you want.

No regrets

Eighty percent of people who currently smoke wouldn't if they had their life over again. For many people, the addiction to tobacco is so strong they struggle to quit smoking and can try many times before they are successful.

 http://smokefree.org.nz/

Australia shows the way

Reports on today's news (13 May 2013) have stated that during tomorrow's budget the Australian government are to cut billions of dollars from their foreign aid budget and the unemployed are to receive extra money to help them survive on the dole and help them get back into the workforce.

Australia plans to cut foreign aid by around 3 billion dollars by deferring a promise to increase spending for the second year in a row and are spending an extra 300 million dollars helping the unemployed.

Mark Purcell from the council for International Development stated "Hundreds of millions of dollars spent in Australia is not going to help the poor of the world".

Well Mr Purcell, the taxes raised from Australians should be spent on Australians first. It is not the Australian governments job to financially assist the whole world.

Here in the UK David Cameron is refusing to cut the foreign aid budget preferring to target those on benefits and public sector workers to make the necessary savings instead. He has pledged to give 11 billion pounds per year in foreign aid.

While in the UK people are struggling to buy food.

13 million people live below the poverty line in the UK. The Trussell Trust, which now operates more than 300 food banks in the UK, has seen demand for its service increase year on year since the 2008/09 financial crisis. In 2011/12, 128,697 emergency food parcels were handed out – up from just 26,000 in 2008/9. In 2012-13 foodbanks fed 346,992 people nationwide. Of those helped, 126,889 were children. Half a million people a year will be in receipt of a food parcel by 2016, by which time there are expected to be 500 food banks.

Charity begins at home Mr Cameron. Cut foreign aid not benefits given to British people who are unemployed or on low wages because your government has made a mess of the economy.

Prussian Blue aged 20

 In 2005 I discovered a new Nationalist singing duo called Prussian Blue. Two very cute young girls who mainly did covers of well known Nationalist anthems with some self penned tracks as well.

Here's an example:

 Following an online search I joined the Official Prussian Blue Forum and was very proud to be given the status of 'Friend of Prussian Blue'.

Two albums and a DVD followed and then they disappeared from public view and I've heard nothing about them for a number of years.

Until yesterday when I read a story in the UK Daily Mail which I've re-produced here. One thing to remember before reading it is that the controlled media will never print anything positive about Nationalism; if they did they'd soon be put out of business.

At the age of 11, blonde-haired, blue-eyed twins Lamb and Lynx Gaede formed a band and saw themselves as the new faces of pop music.

But instead, the girls from Bakersfield, California, would soon be labelled the 'new faces of hate'.

Not surprising when you consider the group they created in 2003 was a neo-Nazi outfit called Prussian Blue -  named after a by-product of the poison used to gas millions of Jews in the Holocaust - at the suggestion of White Nationalist leader William Pierce.

Now however, at the age of 20, the twins have radically transformed themselves from hate-spouting extremists to peace-loving hippies.

And the reason for their change? Marijuana.

The girls, who once wore smiley-face Hitler T-shirts, both now have medical marijuana cards, consider themselves 'healers' and say they are 'pretty liberal now'.

'I’m stoked that we have so many different cultures,' Lynx said. 'I think it’s amazing and it makes me proud of humanity every day that we have so many different places and people.'

Lynx was diagnosed with cancer during her freshman year of high school, when doctors removed a tumour from her shoulder.

She was prescribed OxyContin and morphine to deal with the pain. She also suffers from a rare condition called cyclic vomiting syndrome.

About two years ago, she began smoking to ease withdrawal symptoms and nausea.
'I have to say, marijuana saved my life,' she said. 'I would probably be dead if I didn’t have it.'

Lamb, who suffers from scoliosis and chronic back pain, leading to emotional stress, soon acquired a medical marijuana card of her own.

They said the drug has reignited their creativity, which they now channel in other ways, such as painting.

'We just want to come from a place of love and light,' Lamb said, adding, 'I think we’re meant to do something more - we’re healers. We just want to exert the most love and positivity we can.'

'I'm glad we were in a band, but I think we should have been pushed toward something a little more mainstream and easier for us to handle than being front-men for a belief system that we didn't completely understand at the time,' Lynx told the Daily Mirror.

It is certainly a change of philosophy for the girls who were raised in a redneck community, where they were indoctrinated in extremist principles.

Their grandfather, Bill Gaede, had a swastika on his belt buckle, painted it on his truck and even branded his cattle with the Nazi symbol.

But they blame his daughter, their mother April, for being the main influence on their skewed perspective.

As a member of racist fringe groups such as the National Alliance and the National Vanguard, she had a powerful hold over her children.

By the time the twins were 13, in 2006, they had recorded a roster of songs that were infuriating the nation, with titles including Aryan Man Awake and Hate For Hate: Lamb Near The Lane, co-written by David Lane - the late member of terrorist group The Order and Lamb's then pen-pal.

Lane was ten serving 190 years in prison for his involvement in the murder of Jewish talk show host Alan Berg in 1984.

Soon after the song's release, the girls were labelled by the media 'the new faces of hate', fuelling the firestorm with their angelic faces and smiley-faced Hitler T-shirts.

'Adolf Hitler was a great man who was only trying to preserve his own race in his own country,' Lamb said at the time.

The young teen Lynx added: 'Lots of things were exaggerated about the Second World War. We don't believe that 6million Jews were executed. I mean, there were not even that many Jews alive then.

'We know there were concentration camps but they had swimming pools and tennis courts - that's not how you would treat people if you were getting ready to kill them.'

In 2005, they donated money to victims of Hurricane Katrina but insisted it go to whites only.
Such was their notoriety that they featured in a Louis Theroux documentary about Nazis in 2003.

The sisters now say, however, they simply didn't know better.

Lynx, a painter and furniture restorer who still lives at home with her mother, said: 'My sister and I were home-schooled. We were these country bumpkins. We spent most of our days up on the hill playing with our goats.'

Lamb, now a hotel maid who lives nearby, echoed: 'I was just spouting a lot of knowledge that I had no idea what I was saying.

Their mother, however, still defends encouraging the extremist side project.

'I thought it would just be a little fun thing to do,' she said, adding, 'I didn’t expect it to get as big as it did. If the girls feel regretful about it, I guess I would have to as well.'

Lamb and Lynx said enrolling in public school and moving to northwest Montana has helped them become more open-minded.

However, they said their mother still has dreams of forming an 'intentional' white community in Montana, called Pioneer Little Europe.

But they are reluctant to follow her lead. 'I’m not a white nationalist anymore,' Lamb said. 'My sister and I are pretty liberal now.'

The sisters closed the door with Prussian Blue following the band's 2006 European tour, and have spent the last few years 'lying low and trying to live a normal life,' Lamb said.

They do worry about a backlash from their former fans.

'There are dangerous people in White Nationalism that don’t give a f***, and they would do awful things to people who they think betrayed the movement,' Lamb said, adding, 'We’re stepping on eggshells.'

The sisters are not completely reformed, however.

Asked whether the Holocaust happened, Lynx replied, 'I think certain things happened. I think a lot of the stories got misconstrued. I mean, yeah, Hitler wasn't the best, but Stalin wasn't, Churchill wasn't. I disagree with everybody at that time.'

Lamb added: 'I just think everyone needs to frickin' get over it. That's what I think.'

So let's have a look at some of their comments more closely:

 'I’m stoked that we have so many different cultures,' Lynx said. 'I think it’s amazing and it makes me proud of humanity every day that we have so many different places and people.' 

That's exactly what Nationalism is all about. Contrary to what you're told by the media Nationalists respect all cultures and want them to survive. As White Nationalists our aim to preserve our race and culture and we are happy to work with people of other races who want the same for their people and their culture.

 'There are dangerous people in White Nationalism that don’t give a f***, and they would do awful things to people who they think betrayed the movement,' Lamb said, adding, 'We’re stepping on eggshells.'

There are dangerous people in all walks of life. The vast majority of Nationalists are the loveliest people you could ever hope to meet and I hope that Lamb is aware of that.

As for the girls 'stepping on eggshells' I can't believe that any genuine Nationalist would condemn them for wanting a life of their own after all the hassle they and the rest of their family have been through.


Asked whether the Holocaust happened, Lynx replied, 'I think certain things happened. I think a lot of the stories got misconstrued. I mean, yeah, Hitler wasn't the best, but Stalin wasn't, Churchill wasn't. I disagree with everybody at that time.'

Lamb added: 'I just think everyone needs to frickin' get over it. That's what I think.'

Well said Lamb! This obsession with historical events that none of us can change does no one any good.


Nationalists in the USA in particular seem to be overly obsessed with people and imagery of the 1930's and this is what's holding the movement back in that country. We need a successful Nationalist movement in the USA but it has to be one that is relevant to the modern world.


I wish them all the best for the future and hope that they are happy and successful in whatever they choose to do with their lives.


I don't know if any of the old Prussian Blue forum members ever visit this blog but if they do I'd be very interested in their opinion on the Mail article.

French shootings

I'm sure everyone has heard about the shootings at the Jewish school in Toulouse, south-west France in which three children, aged 3, 6 and 8, and a rabbi were shot dead.

The headline in the Daily Star read 'Four killed in Nazi attack'. The paper reported that 'police are hunting three "neo-Nazi" paratroopers and alledged that the main suspects were "three soldiers who were fired for neo-Nazi activities in 2008."

The Sun's headline was "Hunt for 'Nazi' soldiers after four are killed in France school shooting".

The Daily Mail said that police were hunting an assassin with right-wing connections. The Independant said that it was a "lone nut" with extreme racist views.

Then today we find out the truth.

As I write this French police are engaged in a siege with a man they believe is responsible for the killings.

The suspect, 24, has been named as Mohammed Merah, of Algerian origin, according to French news agency AFP.

French interior minister Claude Gueant said he had declared himself to be a "mujahideen" or Islamic warrior fighting to avenge Palestinian children killed in the conflict with Israel.

"This person has made trips to Afghanistan and Pakistan in the past... and says he belongs to al Qaeda and says he wanted to avenge Palestinian children and to attack the French army. He has links with people involved in jihadism and salafism," he said.

Once again the media try to blame Nationalists for attrocities committed by Muslims.

BNP activist and The Sun

I'm sure that by now everyone is aware of the story in The Sun newspaper about London BNP activist Chris Hirst.

This gutter rag was trying to link Nationalist singer Saga to the Norweigan murderer Anders Breivik and, as Chris Hirst was at one of her concerts, both him and the BNP to Breivik.

This is the newspaper owned by the Zionist Rupert Murdoch who's other newspaper, the News of the World, hacked into the phone of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and the mother of the murdered 8 year old Sarah Payne so they can hardly claim the moral high ground.

What disturbs me the most about incident is the reaction of the BNP. Instead of defending one of their regional officials, in the same way as they did with Ian Kitchin and his granny porn wife, they have thrown Chris to the wolves and expelled him.

Given the choice I would much rather associate with Chris than Ian or his wife.

Is it any surprise that the BNP is falling apart when it's leadership does not have the backbone to stand up for one of it's own against that hate filled object of oppression known as News International.

That newspaper will be a chip wrapper by now and the story long forgotten. Let's face it people only buy The Sun for the breasts and lurid sex stories.

Certainly Chris should have been disciplined but not expelled.

The BNP leadership needs to get it's act together and work out who the real enemies of Nationalism are and people like Chris Hirst are most definitely not the enemy.

New bank holiday

The UK government is considering moving the May Day bank holiday to either Trafalgar Day in October or St Georges Day in April.

There have been lots of calls in England for a bank holiday to celebrate our national saint’s day, 23 April.

The battle of Trafalgar, 21st October 1805, was one of the UK’s greatest military victories. Nelson's crushing defeat of the French and Spanish Navies, established Britain as the dominant world naval power for a century.

I completely agree with moving the holiday but why does it have to be one or the other?

Countries across the EU have the following numbers of public holidays:

Slovakia 18, Cyprus 16, Malta 14, Portugal 12-14, Spain 12-14, Austria 13, Hungary 13, Slovenia 13, Finland 12, Italy 12, Lithuania 12, Czech Republic 12, Greece 10-12, Germany 9-12, France 11, Sweden 11, Latvia 11, Belgium 10, Luxembourg 10, Northern Ireland 10, Poland 10, Denmark 9.5, Ireland 9, Estonia 9, Netherlands 8, Britain 8.

Britain is right at the bottom of the list so instead of choosing between the two why can we not have them both?

Floods in Australia

The state of Queensland in Australia has been hit with massive flooding.

Officials say half of Queensland's 1 852 642km² is affected by the relentless flooding, which began after days of pounding rain caused swollen rivers to overflow. The flood zone covers an area larger than France and Germany combined and bigger than the state of Texas.

The floods have affected about 200,000 people and an estimated 22 towns have been left isolated or inundated by the rising waters, with fears that the damage could cost billions of Australian dollars to repair. So far 10 people have died.


The governments of New Zealand and the USA have offered aid. The silence from the British government is deafening.

When there was flooding in Pakistan there were endless appeals for money. £144 million was provided by the British government alone; more by UK based aid agencies. Where are the appeals to help people, who are mainly of British descent, in Australia?

The entire population of two towns has already been forced to evacuate as water swamped their communities, cutting off roads and devastating crops.

People are facing food shortages and serious public health risks as a result of the floods. The muddy water inundating thousands of homes and businesses has led to a shortage of drinking water and raised fears of mosquito-borne disease.

If you wish to help click here.

Yet another new party!

I see that former BNP official Michaela Mackenzie has sent up a new Nationalist political party called British Freedom.

While I have a lot of respect for Michaela she really needs to take a long hard look at what Nationalism really is and the people she associates with.

One of the officials for this new party, it's press officer, is one James Whittall. Former BNP West Midlands deputy regional organiser and the man who cares so much about the cause he won't spend a penny of his own money on it!

If any of us drive to a meeting, a social or a leafleting session it wouldn't occur to us to claim back the cost of the petrol from our branch or region. Not so with Mr Whittle.

In the first 8 months of this year Mr Whittle claimed £531 in petrol expenses from his local South Shropshire group and from the West Midlands regional account.

And lets not forget the new bluetooth phone kit he bought for himself using West Midlands members donations costing £24.98. It would be nice to know if he has returned the new Epsom printer he bought for £57.97 to his local group as he used their money to pay for it.

You'd think that even a blatent money grabber like Mr Whittle could pay 10p to park his car but no he even claimed for that!

So how could he be allowed to get away this?

Quite simple really. His fiancee was the regional treasurer.

My advice to British Freedom: keep a close eye on your money whenever Mr Whittall is around.

So just how Nationalistic is this new party?

Michael Simpkins, the party's nominating officer says of the BNP, on his own blog, that he and his associates were "outnumbered by hard core far right nationalists who long for a pre 1948 Britain. British Freedom on the other hand is attracting the right sort of nationalist."

And what exactly is wrong with wanting the racial make up of Britain to be the same as it was pre 1948?

If this new party thinks that any Negro who speaks English, waves the Union flag and sings God Save The Queen is as British as those of us whose ancesters were on these islands before they became islands then they are certainly not attracting 'the right sort of Nationalist', they're not attracting Nationalists at all.

While this new party may be an improvement on the Lib/Lab/Con it can't be called Nationalist.

They're just another group of right wing Tories.

BNP Leadership nominations

The results of the nomination process are out:

Griffin 995
Butler 214
Barnbrook 23
Adams 4
Spoilt 7

Out of 4200 people that were eligible to vote only 1219 did

My opinion that Eddy would easily get enough nominations has proved to be way off the mark.

But why did almost 3000 members fail to return their nomination?

Nominations

I have now received my BNP leadership contest nomination form and have decided to nominate Richard Barnbrook.

This is not because I think he would make the ideal leader but because I think having a third candidate is the best way to avoid a damaging split.

I think it a cert that Eddy Butler will receive enough nominations as his campaign has been running for a while and seems to have gathered a lot of support so he doesn't need my nomination but Richard has only recently declared his intention to contest the leadership and has ground to make up if he's to gain enough nominations to stand.

If Eddy Butler or Nick Griffin were to lose the election in a contest just between the two of them I can't see either being able to work with the other, the campaign has become too bitter. I can see them leaving the party and taking their supporters with them. But I think that Richard is someone they could both work with.

So I encourage everyone who wants to preserve the unity of the party to nominate Richard Barnbrook.

Visit his website at http://richardbarnbrookgla.blogspot.com/

BNP Leadership election

So now four people have put themselves forward for the role of leader of the BNP.

As well as Nick Griffin there are Derek Adams, Richard Barnbrook and Eddy Butler.

Eddy Butler is the one we've all been hearing about. His statement is

I believe we need a complete re-launch in order to survive as a Party.I seek a year’s term as Chairman in order to bring in the necessary changes and hold free elections next year than will result in a fresh face.I will bring in measures to ensure financial transparency to restore confidence in the Party’s finances.I will bring in constitutional changes to make the Party more democratically accountable and have a separation of powers between the political Chairman and the administration.I would bring all functions such as the call centre back to the mainland and close the Belfast office.I would terminate the contract of our fundraising consultant and we would become self sufficient.I would ensure that our resources are focussed on the front line and not wasted on bureaucracy.I would ensure that the Party stays together with no recriminations after this leadership election.

Derek Adams? Leading activist and publican from Manchester. Strongly opposed to the smoking ban. That alone would stop me from voting for him but also because his statement on the party website does nothing more than condemn Eddy Butler.

Unlike Mr. Butler I don't seek to be a disposable chairman or a stalking horse for undeclared and shadowy third parties. I seek election for a full-term. I love this Party and despise those who seek to sow dissent and demoralise our activists. They have provided propaganda for our enemies to throw at our candidates on the doorstep. Real grievances must be dealt with by people with true hearts, not those whose main purpose is to seek position or jobs.Our vote increased at the General Election and we have more enquiries and a larger membership than ever. But some people still think it’s time for a change. If you feel that change is indeed needed, then nominate me, a clean-hands candidate who will be a fresh face but who, unlike Mr. Butler, has not sought to advance my candidacy by working with supporters who spread lies and black propaganda.

Then there's Richard Barnbrook. Member of the GLA and previously engaged to a woman with a mixed race child.

Famed as ‘the man in the beige suit’, dyslexic and partial to the occasional drink, I know my limitations! But I have never wavered from the strength of my convictions and I’ve always spoken direct from the heart.Nick has achieved miracles in modernising the Party; Eddy has electioneering, strategic experience, - but the Party is divided. There’s a real desire for change but we also need time to take stock, and plan how to move forward together with renewed energy. If we act in haste we risk losing all we have built.Our success and unity is more important than the ambitions of any individual. I offer integrity, impartiality and lack of self-interest that will command the loyalty and solidarity of all the membership. I will act as a caretaker leader till elections and end the strife caused by this destructive, divisive and bitter campaign. Choose stability and unity.

And then, of course, there's Nick Griffin

Our tremendous record speaks for itself, which is why our enemies try every trick in their grubby book to smear me and key members of my winning team.To break contracts, sack our young team in the highly popular and successful call centre, and go back to amateurism, would be organisational and financial suicide. The experience and technology we’ve acquired must be used to modernise our election-fighting machine, not thrown away out of spite and personal ambition.We’ve spent time and money modernising our central administration, now we’re going to professionalise our regional and local organisation.In ten years, our activists and I have turned this party from a bad political joke into a major factor in British politics. There is still much to be done, and it is best done under proven, principled and visionary leadership, without futile, time-wasting elections. We’ve come this far, let us go forward together!

So which one to vote for.

Clearly none of them will answer 'yes' to the questions I put to Eddy Butler in my last post.

Adams is an also ran so it's between the other three.

If Nick wants my vote he'll need to explain the party finances a bit better.

According to the party website " in exchange for fees of £165,000 over two years, Midas has generated a fundraising income for the BNP of £2.3 million — and saved us over £156,000 through their procurement techniques and expertise."

Sounds good so why is the party virtually bankrupt now?

I've been told about companies and the tax office threatening court action due to unpaid bills, party staff being paid late, printers refusing to print items for the party because of late payments and money being borrowed from the regions.

So where have they been spending this £2.3 million? Well apparently some of it's gone on Plasma screen TV's for training purposes.

How about paying the bills first and if there's anything left then buying plasma screen TV's?

I also don't like the way Nick has moved the party towards becoming a Christian party. That's not what I joined. Politics and religion should be seperate and any white person should feel at home in the BNP, their religion is irrelevant.

Nominations close on the 10th August so I've some time to decide, which is good as none of them really appeal at the moment.

Eddy Butler

Two questions for Eddy Butler.

1) If you become leader of the BNP will you guarantee to change the constitution so that the party becomes a white organisation again, no black members, no Asians (of any religion), no orientals, no half castes and no Jews?

2) Will you stop the BNP from moving ever closer to becoming a Christian fundamentalist party obsessed with Islam and acknowledge that the only reason we have a problem in this country with Islam is because of all the non whites living here and if they were all repatriated then a tiny handful of white Muslims would pose no threat?

If you can answer yes to both questions then you have my vote for the party leadership.

If you cannot then what is the point of supporting you. The main problems in the party will not change.

The EU

It will come as no surprise to Nationalists but the findings of a new poll (Angus Reid Public Opinion Published on Jun 01 2010) shows that the majority of British people, even those that vote for the pro EU Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties, do not want to be part of the EU or the Euro currency.

Here are the findings:

In the online survey of a representative national sample of 1,984 British adults, 51 per cent of respondents say EU membership has been moderately negative (26%) or very negative (25%) for the United Kingdom.

Conversely, seven per cent of Britons say the EU has been very positive for the UK, and 31 per cent regard it as moderately positive.

If a referendum on the UK’s permanence in the EU were called, two fifths of Britons (42%) would vote in favour of pulling out, while 35 per cent would vote to stay.

If a plebiscite on the UK adopting the euro were called, a large majority of Britons (79%) would vote against abandoning the pound as the national currency. Only nine per cent of respondents would welcome the euro.

Overall, party allegiances make some difference in how people in Britain feel about the EU. Conservative voters are largely inclined to say EU membership has been detrimental for the UK (66%), but so are many Labour (41%) and Liberal Democrat (41%) voters.

Almost half of Labour (48%) and Liberal Democrat (46%) followers would vote in favour of remaining in the EU in an eventual referendum, while a majority of Tories (57%) would vote to pull out.

Adopting the euro is out of the question for most Britons of all political stripes. At least seven-in-ten Liberal Democrats, Labour and Tory supporters would vote against embracing the EU currency.

Smoking ban and heart attacks

A new study has shown that the smoking ban has helped reduce the number of heart attacks suffered by people in England and saved the NHS over 8 million pounds.

The study, which was carried out by researchers from the University of Bath, has reported that there were 1,200 fewer hospital admissions for heart attacks in England in the year after July 2007 - when the smoking ban came in. The researchers suggest that this may be due to the general population being exposed to less second-hand smoke since the legislation came in.

The study looked at whether there was a difference between the number of people admitted to hospital with a heart attack in the five years before the smoking ban began in England compared to the 15 months afterwards and was the largest, most comprehensive study to date on the effects of smoke-free legislation anywhere in the world.

Separate research by the London Health Observatory carried out on the basis of these figures suggested a saving to the NHS of £8.4m in the first year after the ban on smoking in public indoor spaces was introduced in England.
A similar kind of study was done in New York. According to this study, heart attack rates have dropped by 8 percent following the Clean Indoor Air Act of 2003 that prohibits smoking in bars, restaurants and other public places. The report, issued by the state Health Department, found that hospitals admitted 3,813 fewer patients for heart attacks in 2004 than would be expected in New York without the indoor smoking ban. Studies elsewhere have reached similar conclusions. In one case, the rate of admissions for heart attacks returned to normal after the ban was lifted.

Similar results were obtained in Scotland. Following the introduction of smoke-free legislation the health of individuals has improved significantly and the heart attack rates have dropped dramatically. Hospital admissions for heart attacks have dropped by 17 percent after the legislation was introduced in Scotland.

The number of acute coronary events such as heart attacks in adults also dropped significantly after a smoking ban in public places in Italy. Researchers in Rome compared acute coronary events in the city for five years preceding a public smoking ban with those occurring one year after the ban. They found an 11.2 percent reduction of acute coronary events in persons 35 to 64 years and a 7.9 percent reduction in those ages 65 to 74.

As a result of smoking in public places, passive smokers or non-smokers are the ones that are mostly affected as they tend to inhale all the dangerous chemicals released due to tobacco burning. Most of these chemicals have been reported to cause cancer and heart attacks. Physiological effects of tobacco smoke on cardiovascular functions include stiffening aorta, platelet activation resulting in damaged artery lining, disturbed heart rhythm and vasoconstriction. Smoking also causes development of plaques inside blood vessels leading to heart attacks. The smoking ban has reduced the exposure to smoke in the general population.

So there we have it. Yet more evidence that the ban on smoking in public places is good for all of our people.

How can anyone still oppose it?

Sadie Graham and Matt Single

Sadie Graham and her husband Matt Single were quite happy for the addresses of BNP members to appear on the internet, click here for details, so I'm sure they wouldn't object to their details appearing on here.

Surname	GRAHAM-SINGLE
Forename(s)	SADIE BETHANY
Title	MRS
Gender	Female
Occupation	Housewife/husband
Date of Birth	17 December 1978
Last Known Address	46 Harebeating Drive Hailsham East Sussex BN27 1JE
This person may also be known as	SADIE BETHANY GRAHAM

Autism and immigration

Researchers at St George's Hospital, London have discovered an increased risk of autism in children whose parents had migrated to Britain from Africa, the Caribbean and Asia.

The size of the increased risk was five times greater for Caribbean people. The risk was also very significant, but slightly less, for African people and much lower, but still present, for Asian people.

The research covered 428 children diagnosed with autism during a six-year period. They found no increased risk in children whose parents who had migrated to the UK from other European countries.

Autism is a severe lifelong developmental condition which affects people's ability to communicate, form relationships and interact socially.

The lifetime cost to society for someone with autism is estimated to be £4.7m.

The Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities says that Autism costs the UK almost £28bn a year. Adults with autism cost £25bn a year, while for children the figure is £2.7bn.

If immigration can increase the risk of autism in children from the third world then this is yet another good reason, if another should be needed, for stopping all non white immigration into Britain.