Looking back it's clear that Margaret Thatcher was trying to destroy the power of the unions and in the process destroyed local communities and a vital industry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db14/0db14ee1dce4871b515390b734f1b6c43bc4a5f6" alt=""
During the 1970's the unions were at the height of their power. There were endless strikes afflicting the Post Office, steel industry, the ferries, steelworks and much more. Car and truck-maker British Leyland was repeatedly brought to a standstill in the Midlands. In 1979 public sector workers went out on strike for weeks. Uncollected mountains of rubbish piled high in the cities, Green Goddesses were on the streets, and bodies remained unburied. The latter only happened in Liverpool, but became an emblem of the chaos inflicted on the public by the unions.
Rather than simply representing their members in the workplace the unions, with their Communist leadership, wanted to bring the country to its knees. The mass industrial action was not for the benefit of their members but an attempt to impose a Communist revolution.
Bringing the unions down was necessary but Thatcher didn't care what else she destroyed in the process. Her destruction of industries and communities was a tragedy. Let's not forget, though, that the union leadership was just as guilty as Thatcher.
I've never been a member of a union. They just perpetuate the class struggle, workers against bosses. It's in the unions own interest to have an enemy, of course, without the enemy they would be unnecessary and their dreams of Communist revolution would disappear along with their leaders six figure salaries.
Wouldn't our working life be much more pleasant if workers and bosses worked together for the benefit of all instead of this constant battle?
Of course that ideal world doesn't yet exist and there are still bosses out there who exploit their workers at every opportunity. So what's the answer?
How about workers co-operatives?
Worker co‑operatives are businesses that are owned and controlled by their employee members using co‑operative principles. Each of the members - from the manager to the office junior - owns a share of the business. Decisions are made democratically and profits are shared among the members or put back into the business. Conflict and strife are minimised because workers and owners are one and the same.
Isn't that a better way than left wing class war unions or the capitalists' exploitation of workers?
No comments:
Post a Comment